Re: [HACKERS] obj_description problems? - Mailing list pgsql-patches

From Christopher Kings-Lynne
Subject Re: [HACKERS] obj_description problems?
Date
Msg-id 3F95DD0B.5080603@familyhealth.com.au
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: [HACKERS] obj_description problems?  (Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>)
Responses Re: [HACKERS] obj_description problems?
List pgsql-patches
>>*sigh* - it's really not my day today.  Attached is patch that actually
>>compiles and fixes the problem.  We will need to bump CATVERSION, and
>>maybe should test all the other qualified functions?
>
> I think you've identified a real issue, but how many of these modified
> functions did you actually test?  I thought SUBSTRING was a reserved
> word, for example ...

Well, some...  I did run the regression tests and they passed, but I
assumed that they would call all of the functions.

OK, I will test them all today and get back to you.

Chris



pgsql-patches by date:

Previous
From: Tom Lane
Date:
Subject: Re: [HACKERS] obj_description problems?
Next
From: Christopher Kings-Lynne
Date:
Subject: Re: [HACKERS] obj_description problems?