Re: [HACKERS] obj_description problems? - Mailing list pgsql-patches

From Tom Lane
Subject Re: [HACKERS] obj_description problems?
Date
Msg-id 21903.1066745580@sss.pgh.pa.us
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: [HACKERS] obj_description problems?  (Christopher Kings-Lynne <chriskl@familyhealth.com.au>)
Responses Re: [HACKERS] obj_description problems?
List pgsql-patches
Christopher Kings-Lynne <chriskl@familyhealth.com.au> writes:
> *sigh* - it's really not my day today.  Attached is patch that actually
> compiles and fixes the problem.  We will need to bump CATVERSION, and
> maybe should test all the other qualified functions?

I think you've identified a real issue, but how many of these modified
functions did you actually test?  I thought SUBSTRING was a reserved
word, for example ...

            regards, tom lane

pgsql-patches by date:

Previous
From: Tom Lane
Date:
Subject: Re: AIX port current
Next
From: Bruce Momjian
Date:
Subject: Re: pg_dump problems against 7.0