Tom Lane wrote:
>"Zeugswetter Andreas SB SD" <ZeugswetterA@spardat.at> writes:
>
>! } while (!(z > 0 && z < MAX_RANDOM_VALUE));
>
>! } while (z == 0 || z == MAX_RANDOM_VALUE);
>
>This seems fairly ugly, since it eliminates the original coding's
>positive guarantee that the final result is in 0 < x < 1. Does your
>compiler manage not to choke if we add a cast instead?
>
> } while (!(z > 0 && z < (long) MAX_RANDOM_VALUE));
>
>
>
Or put an "L" suffix on the value in pg_config_manual.h, so it gets
picked up everywhere?
cheers
andrew
