Re: PostgreSQL <> MySQL: missing the point? - Mailing list pgsql-advocacy

From Kaarel
Subject Re: PostgreSQL <> MySQL: missing the point?
Date
Msg-id 3F6591A6.5090601@future.ee
Whole thread Raw
In response to PostgreSQL <> MySQL: missing the point?  (Alexey Borzov <borz_off@cs.msu.su>)
List pgsql-advocacy
> * If MySQL is so stable, why does it have myisamchk utility and
> *built-in* REPAIR TABLE command?

Perhaps this is one of the reasons and it's probably somewhere in the
documentation too so it cannot be a bug therefore it must be a feature :)

Heikki Tuuri "'nosync' is dangerous. If there is a power outage, or the
OS crashes, there is a great chance that your tablespace will be
corrupted. MyISAM always runs in the 'nosync' mode, that is, it never
calls fsync() to flush the files to disk."
http://lists.mysql.com/mysql/148920

Kaarel


pgsql-advocacy by date:

Previous
From: Alexey Borzov
Date:
Subject: PostgreSQL <> MySQL: missing the point?
Next
From: Michael Pohl
Date:
Subject: Re: PostgreSQL <> MySQL: missing the point?