Re: Linux ready for high-volume databases? - Mailing list pgsql-general

From Dennis Gearon
Subject Re: Linux ready for high-volume databases?
Date
Msg-id 3F4B75F7.6030306@fireserve.net
Whole thread Raw
In response to Linux ready for high-volume databases?  (Ron Johnson <ron.l.johnson@cox.net>)
List pgsql-general
Free BSD may be a toy, maybe not, but it runs more of the webhosting
domains than any other OS.

Ron Johnson wrote:

>On Mon, 2003-08-25 at 16:28, Gregory S. Williamson wrote:
>
>
>>One of our sysads sent this link ... wondering if there is any comment on it from the world of actual users of linux
anda database. 
>>
>><http://story.news.yahoo.com/news?tmpl=story&cid=1738&ncid=738&e=9&u=/zd/20030825/tc_zd/55311>
>>
>>
>
>"Weak points include lack of available tools, ease of use and ease
>of installation"
>
>Sounds like he needs point-and-drool tools...
>
>On the other hand, could even a beefy Linux 2.4 *today* system handle
>a 24x7 500GB db that must process 6-8M OLTP-style transactions per
>day, while also getting hit by report queries?
>
>Don't think of this as a troll, because I really don't know, even
>though I do know that MVS, OpenVMS & Solaris can.  (I won't even
>ask about toys like Windows and FreeBSD.)
>
>
>


pgsql-general by date:

Previous
From: Dennis Gearon
Date:
Subject: Re: many columns with references to one table
Next
From: Dennis Gearon
Date:
Subject: Re: move to usenet?