Linux ready for high-volume databases? - Mailing list pgsql-general

From Ron Johnson
Subject Linux ready for high-volume databases?
Date
Msg-id 1061884542.15963.14.camel@haggis
Whole thread Raw
In response to  ("Gregory S. Williamson" <gsw@globexplorer.com>)
Responses Re: Linux ready for high-volume databases?  ("Shridhar Daithankar" <shridhar_daithankar@persistent.co.in>)
Re: Linux ready for high-volume databases?  (Dennis Gearon <gearond@fireserve.net>)
Re: Linux ready for high-volume databases?  (Al Hulaton <ahulaton@commandprompt.com>)
List pgsql-general
On Mon, 2003-08-25 at 16:28, Gregory S. Williamson wrote:
> One of our sysads sent this link ... wondering if there is any comment on it from the world of actual users of linux
anda database. 
>
> <http://story.news.yahoo.com/news?tmpl=story&cid=1738&ncid=738&e=9&u=/zd/20030825/tc_zd/55311>

"Weak points include lack of available tools, ease of use and ease
of installation"

Sounds like he needs point-and-drool tools...

On the other hand, could even a beefy Linux 2.4 *today* system handle
a 24x7 500GB db that must process 6-8M OLTP-style transactions per
day, while also getting hit by report queries?

Don't think of this as a troll, because I really don't know, even
though I do know that MVS, OpenVMS & Solaris can.  (I won't even
ask about toys like Windows and FreeBSD.)

--
-----------------------------------------------------------------
Ron Johnson, Jr. ron.l.johnson@cox.net
Jefferson, LA USA

"Knowledge should be free for all."
Harcourt Fenton Mudd, Star Trek:TOS, "I, Mudd"


pgsql-general by date:

Previous
From: Dennis Björklund
Date:
Subject: Re: Index usage
Next
From: "Shridhar Daithankar"
Date:
Subject: Re: Linux ready for high-volume databases?