Bruce Momjian wrote:
> Is there a TODO here?
Maybe!? It's one of these premature things noone can tell by now. So the
TODO would be "investigation" for now.
Jan
>
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------------
>
> Tom Lane wrote:
>> Jan Wieck <JanWieck@Yahoo.com> writes:
>> > I'm thinking instead of a way to "cache" entire executors for this. Each
>> > SPI plan used during a transaction would need it's own executor, and I
>> > don't know offhand what type and how much resources an executor requires
>> > (I think it's only some memory that get's initialized and the VFD's
>> > opened).
>>
>> Hmm. This is probably more feasible now than it would have been a year
>> ago, because I did some cleanup work to ensure that executor state is
>> localized into a specific memory context. I'm not certain about the
>> amount of overhead either, but it's surely worth a try.
>>
>> regards, tom lane
>>
>
--
#======================================================================#
# It's easier to get forgiveness for being wrong than for being right. #
# Let's break this rule - forgive me. #
#================================================== JanWieck@Yahoo.com #
