Re: [GENERAL] 7.4Beta - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Bruce Momjian
Subject Re: [GENERAL] 7.4Beta
Date
Msg-id 200308152217.h7FMHX317638@candle.pha.pa.us
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: [GENERAL] 7.4Beta  (Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>)
Responses Re: [GENERAL] 7.4Beta
List pgsql-hackers
Is there a TODO here?

---------------------------------------------------------------------------

Tom Lane wrote:
> Jan Wieck <JanWieck@Yahoo.com> writes:
> > I'm thinking instead of a way to "cache" entire executors for this. Each 
> > SPI plan used during a transaction would need it's own executor, and I 
> > don't know offhand what type and how much resources an executor requires 
> > (I think it's only some memory that get's initialized and the VFD's 
> > opened).
> 
> Hmm.  This is probably more feasible now than it would have been a year
> ago, because I did some cleanup work to ensure that executor state is
> localized into a specific memory context.  I'm not certain about the
> amount of overhead either, but it's surely worth a try.
> 
>             regards, tom lane
> 

--  Bruce Momjian                        |  http://candle.pha.pa.us pgman@candle.pha.pa.us               |  (610)
359-1001+  If your life is a hard drive,     |  13 Roberts Road +  Christ can be your backup.        |  Newtown Square,
Pennsylvania19073
 


pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: "Merlin Moncure"
Date:
Subject: Re: best way to retreive the next record in a multi column index
Next
From: David Fetter
Date:
Subject: Re: New function: epoch_to_timestamp...