Bruce Momjian wrote:
>>>
>>>
>>Still, if there's something not precise, it should be cleared. Which
>>tough assumptions are made that seem doubtful to you?
>>
>>
>
>It just seemed complex to figure out which operators needed parens and
>which didn't.
>
>
Only very-well-documented operators (Chapter 4.1.6) are parens-optimized
(+-*/%); this topic was reviewed from Tom. When using ^ or user defined
other operators, they will be decorated with (maybe useless) parens.
Regards,
Andreas
