Re: new psql \d command - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Bruce Momjian
Subject Re: new psql \d command
Date
Msg-id 200308071608.h77G8JQ12097@candle.pha.pa.us
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: new psql \d command  (Andreas Pflug <pgadmin@pse-consulting.de>)
Responses Re: new psql \d command
Re: new psql \d command
List pgsql-hackers
Andreas Pflug wrote:
> Bruce Momjian wrote:
> 
> >It might be a bit risky getting pg_dump to use it though?
> >  
> >
> >
> >I don't think we every want pg_dump to use it --- better accurate than
> >pretty in there. 
> >
> Agreed.
> 
> > There seems to be some tough assumptions that have to
> >be made in that function that are better used for visual-only cases.
> >  
> >
> Still, if there's something not precise, it should be cleared. Which 
> tough assumptions are made that seem doubtful to you?

It just seemed complex to figure out which operators needed parens and
which didn't.

--  Bruce Momjian                        |  http://candle.pha.pa.us pgman@candle.pha.pa.us               |  (610)
359-1001+  If your life is a hard drive,     |  13 Roberts Road +  Christ can be your backup.        |  Newtown Square,
Pennsylvania19073
 


pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Andreas Pflug
Date:
Subject: Re: new psql \d command
Next
From: Tom Lane
Date:
Subject: Re: new psql \d command