Re: plPHP -- sort of an announcement.. but not commercial - Mailing list pgsql-general

From Joe Conway
Subject Re: plPHP -- sort of an announcement.. but not commercial
Date
Msg-id 3F2E8BA4.1050804@joeconway.com
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: plPHP -- sort of an announcement.. but not commercial  ("scott.marlowe" <scott.marlowe@ihs.com>)
Responses Re: plPHP -- sort of an announcement.. but not commercial
List pgsql-general
scott.marlowe wrote:
>>10.Fix license
>
> Looking at the license for PHP found here:
>
> http://www.php.net/license/3_0.txt
>
> it would seem to be pretty much an apache style license that doesn't allow
> you to relicense it without permission.  but it looks BSD compatible.
>
>

The issue was that plPHP as posted was claimed to be GPL, although there
isn't any notice at all in the source that I saw.

Does the PHP license require programs that dynamically link carry their
license, similar to GPL (I didn't get that impression)? If not, then
something like PL/PHP should be licensable under BSD.

Joe


pgsql-general by date:

Previous
From: "Shridhar Daithankar"
Date:
Subject: Re: [PERFORM] OSDL Database Test Suite 3 is available on PostgreSQL
Next
From: "scott.marlowe"
Date:
Subject: Re: plPHP -- sort of an announcement.. but not commercial