Re: plPHP -- sort of an announcement.. but not commercial - Mailing list pgsql-general

From scott.marlowe
Subject Re: plPHP -- sort of an announcement.. but not commercial
Date
Msg-id Pine.LNX.4.33.0308041041520.10507-100000@css120.ihs.com
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: plPHP -- sort of an announcement.. but not commercial  (Joe Conway <mail@joeconway.com>)
Responses Re: plPHP -- sort of an announcement.. but not commercial  (Sean Chittenden <sean@chittenden.org>)
List pgsql-general
On Mon, 4 Aug 2003, Joe Conway wrote:

> scott.marlowe wrote:
> >>10.Fix license
> >
> > Looking at the license for PHP found here:
> >
> > http://www.php.net/license/3_0.txt
> >
> > it would seem to be pretty much an apache style license that doesn't allow
> > you to relicense it without permission.  but it looks BSD compatible.
>
> The issue was that plPHP as posted was claimed to be GPL, although there
> isn't any notice at all in the source that I saw.
>
> Does the PHP license require programs that dynamically link carry their
> license, similar to GPL (I didn't get that impression)? If not, then
> something like PL/PHP should be licensable under BSD.

Yeah, I'm pretty sure it's safe to link to.  We could always as the PHP
guys themselves to be sure.



pgsql-general by date:

Previous
From: Joe Conway
Date:
Subject: Re: plPHP -- sort of an announcement.. but not commercial
Next
From: Joseph Shraibman
Date:
Subject: Re: like performance w/o wildcards.