Re: array support patch phase 1 patch - Mailing list pgsql-patches

From Joe Conway
Subject Re: array support patch phase 1 patch
Date
Msg-id 3EDAD692.40804@joeconway.com
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: array support patch phase 1 patch  (Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>)
Responses Re: array support patch phase 1 patch  (Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>)
List pgsql-patches
Tom Lane wrote:
> That would mask the problem for ANALYZE, but not for anything else.
>
> Whether there is anything else I'm not sure, but I can't say I feel
> comfortable about that answer.
>

What if we modify equality_oper() and friends to do the check for us
when argtype is a varlena array?

If an array type is checked for an ordering operator, its element type
now *must* have an ordering operator in order for the result to be
meaningful. Same goes for ordering_oper().

Joe



pgsql-patches by date:

Previous
From: Tom Lane
Date:
Subject: Re: array support patch phase 1 patch
Next
From: Tom Lane
Date:
Subject: Re: array support patch phase 1 patch