Re: array support patch phase 1 patch - Mailing list pgsql-patches

From Tom Lane
Subject Re: array support patch phase 1 patch
Date
Msg-id 1731.1054529522@sss.pgh.pa.us
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: array support patch phase 1 patch  (Joe Conway <mail@joeconway.com>)
List pgsql-patches
Joe Conway <mail@joeconway.com> writes:
> Tom Lane wrote:
>> That would mask the problem for ANALYZE, but not for anything else.

> What if we modify equality_oper() and friends to do the check for us
> when argtype is a varlena array?

> If an array type is checked for an ordering operator, its element type
> now *must* have an ordering operator in order for the result to be
> meaningful. Same goes for ordering_oper().

That sounds more like a solution.  Is there anyplace else we need to
push knowledge of this into?  (Offhand I can't think of any, but ...)

            regards, tom lane

pgsql-patches by date:

Previous
From: Joe Conway
Date:
Subject: Re: array support patch phase 1 patch
Next
From: Peter Eisentraut
Date:
Subject: Re: [HACKERS] Are we losing momentum?