Re: postgresql and process titles - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Jim Nasby
Subject Re: postgresql and process titles
Date
Msg-id 3E9F8629-1EFE-4790-A885-D84C22286385@pervasive.com
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: postgresql and process titles  (Kris Kennaway <kris@obsecurity.org>)
List pgsql-hackers
On Jun 13, 2006, at 9:42 PM, Kris Kennaway wrote:
>> BTW, there's another FBSD performance odditiy I've run across.  
>> Running
>>
>> pg_dump -t email_contrib -COx stats | bzip2 > ec.sql.bz2 &
>>
>> which dumps the email_contrib table to bzip2 then to disk, the OS
>> won't use more than 1 CPU on an SMP system... unless the data is
>> cached. According to both gstat and systat -v, the system isn't I/O
>> bound; both are reporting the RAID10 with that table on it as only
>> about 10% busy. If I let that command run for a bit then cancel it
>> and re-start it so that the beginning of that table is in cache, it
>> will use one entire CPU for bzip2, which is what I'd expect to  
>> happen.
>
> Hmm, odd..maybe something with the scheduler.  I'd need access to a
> test case to be able to figure it out though.

well, pg_dump of any sizeable database piped through bzip2 or gzip  
should show this. Try:

pg_dump large_database | bzip2 > databasedump.sql.bz2
--
Jim C. Nasby, Sr. Engineering Consultant      jnasby@pervasive.com
Pervasive Software      http://pervasive.com    work: 512-231-6117
vcard: http://jim.nasby.net/pervasive.vcf       cell: 512-569-9461




pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Jim Nasby
Date:
Subject: Re: postgresql and process titles
Next
From: Tom Lane
Date:
Subject: oprofile results for stats collector test