Re: Are we losing momentum? - Mailing list pgsql-general

From Dennis Gearon
Subject Re: Are we losing momentum?
Date
Msg-id 3E9B4728.7945BD2F@cvc.net
Whole thread Raw
In response to Are we losing momentum?  (Bruce Momjian <pgman@candle.pha.pa.us>)
List pgsql-general
With the feature set that Postgres has, it isn't going to lose momentum.

It is lacking in some areas that are slowly being addressed.

If they weren't being addressed, THEN, postgres would lose momentum.

We're fortunate to have good volunteers and the private donations of
companies as well.

Bruce Momjian wrote:
>
> Several people have asked if we are losing momentum.  Specifically, they
> are concerned about Red Hat dropping their Red Hat Database and instead
> distributing PostgreSQL as part of Red Hat Enterprise Server, and they
> are concerned about recent press articles about MySQL.
>
> Let me address these.  First, the Red Hat change probably has a lot to
> do with Oracle's relationship with Red Hat, and very little to do with
> PostgreSQL.  Their pullback is similar to Great Bridge's closing, except
> that Red Hat's database group is still around, so we aren't losing Tom
> Lane or Patrick MacDonald (who is completing our PITR work for 7.4).
>
> As far as MySQL, they have a company to push articles to the press, and
> many writers just dress them up and print them --- you can tell them
> because the pushed ones mention only MySQL, while the non=pushed ones
> mention MySQL and PostgreSQL.
>
> I have been around the globe enough to know that PostgreSQL is well on
> track.  Our user base is growing, we have Win32 and PITR ready for 7.4
> (and each had some commercial funding to make them happen.)  Recently, I
> have also been fielding questions from several companies that want to
> hire PostgreSQL developers to work for the community.
>
> But most importantly, there is mind share.  I get _very_ few questions
> about MySQL anymore, and when the database topic comes up on Slashdot,
> the MySQL guys usually end up looking foolish for using MySQL.  And my
> recent trip to Toronto (who's details I have shared with core but can
> not discuss) left no doubt in my mind that PostgreSQL is moving forward
> at a rapid rate.
>
> And, I have 1.5k emails to read after a one week trip.  :-)
>
> --
>   Bruce Momjian                        |  http://candle.pha.pa.us
>   pgman@candle.pha.pa.us               |  (610) 359-1001
>   +  If your life is a hard drive,     |  13 Roberts Road
>   +  Christ can be your backup.        |  Newtown Square, Pennsylvania 19073
>
> ---------------------------(end of broadcast)---------------------------
> TIP 5: Have you checked our extensive FAQ?
>
> http://www.postgresql.org/docs/faqs/FAQ.html


pgsql-general by date:

Previous
From: Tom Lane
Date:
Subject: Re: Strange query optimization in 7.3.2
Next
From: Martijn van Oosterhout
Date:
Subject: Re: Help using pgfsck