Re: Easy read-heavy benchmark kicking around? - Mailing list pgsql-performance

From Luke Lonergan
Subject Re: Easy read-heavy benchmark kicking around?
Date
Msg-id 3E37B936B592014B978C4415F90D662D03EA25E7@MI8NYCMAIL06.Mi8.com
Whole thread Raw
In response to Easy read-heavy benchmark kicking around?  (Brian Hurt <bhurt@janestcapital.com>)
List pgsql-performance
Select count(*) from table-twice-size-of-ram

Divide the query time by the number of pages in the table times the pagesize (normally 8KB) and you have your net disk
rate.

- Luke

Msg is shrt cuz m on ma treo

 -----Original Message-----
From:     Brian Hurt [mailto:bhurt@janestcapital.com]
Sent:    Monday, November 06, 2006 03:49 PM Eastern Standard Time
To:    pgsql-performance@postgresql.org
Subject:    [PERFORM] Easy read-heavy benchmark kicking around?

I'm having a spot of problem with out storage device vendor.  Read
performance (as measured by both bonnie++ and hdparm -t) is abysmal
(~14Mbyte/sec), and we're trying to get them to fix it.  Unfortunately,
they're using the fact that bonnie++ is an open source benchmark to
weasle out of doing anything- they can't fix it unless I can show an
impact in Postgresql.

So the question is: is there an easy to install and run, read-heavy
benchmark out there that I can wave at them to get them to fix the
problem?  I have a second database running on a single SATA drive, so I
can use that as a comparison point- "look, we're getting 1/3rd the read
speed of a single SATA drive- this sucks!"

Any advice?

Brian


---------------------------(end of broadcast)---------------------------
TIP 2: Don't 'kill -9' the postmaster



pgsql-performance by date:

Previous
From: Brian Hurt
Date:
Subject: Easy read-heavy benchmark kicking around?
Next
From: "Merlin Moncure"
Date:
Subject: Re: Easy read-heavy benchmark kicking around?