On 2015-09-05 12:48:12 +0300, Ildus Kurbangaliev wrote:Another parts require a some discussion so I didn't touch them yet.
At this point I don't see any point in further review until these areaddressed.The idea to create an individual tranches for individual LWLocks have
come from Heikki Linnakangas and I also think that tranche is a good place to keep
LWLock name.
I think it's rather ugly.Base of these tranches points to MainLWLockArray
And that's just plain wrong. The base of a tranche ought to point to thefirst lwlock in it.
Ok, I've kept only one tranche for individual LWLocks
I don't really like the tranche model as in the patch right now. I'd
rather have in a way that we have one tranch for all the individual
lwlocks, where the tranche points to an array of names alongside the
tranche's name. And then for the others we just supply the tranche name,
but leave the name array empty, whereas a name can be generated.
Maybe I don't understand something here, but why add extra field to all tranches
if we need only one array (especially the array for individual LWLocks).
