Gary Stainburn wrote:
> On Thursday 19 Dec 2002 9:58 am, Tomasz Myrta wrote:
>
> >Gary Stainburn wrote:
> >
> >>That did the trick. However, I now have another problem with the
> >>constraint
> >>complaining about there not being an index to refer to. However,
> >>there is.
The error is inside declaration of table "ranks.
You can't create two similiar foreign keys: one based on field (rrank)
and second one based on fields (rdid,rrank).
You have to change:
jrank int4 not null references ranks(rrank), -- needs sorting
to
jrank int4 not null, -- needs sorting
> This is probably because of my background in as a COBOL programmer where
> having multiple fields of the same name can cause problems (especially
> with
> MF Cobol which only partially supports it) as well as early (read
> early 80's)
> database experince where it wasn't allowed. Also, I find it usefull
> because
> I know immediately which table a field has come from.
As you wish.
>
>
> Why does it make joins easier to use the same name for fields?
If you create queries like this, you get rid of duplicates.
select *
from
jobtypes
join departments using (did)
If you are afraid of duplicates, you can always use an alias:
select ranks.rank_id as rid,
...
If you want, here is my minimal version of your tables:
create table depts ( dept_id int4 primary key, ...
};
create table ranks (
rank_id int4 default nextval('ranks_rid_seq') primary key,
dept_id int4 references depts, -- department
rank int4 not null, -- departmental rank
rdesc character varying(40) -- Rank Description
);
create table jobtypes (
jobtype_id int4 default nextval('jobs_jid_seq') primary key,
rank_id int4 references ranks(rank_id),
jdesc character varying(40) -- job description
);
Tomasz Myrta
