Re: Win2K Questions - Mailing list pgsql-general

From Jean-Luc Lachance
Subject Re: Win2K Questions
Date
Msg-id 3DD009ED.DA657733@nsd.ca
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: Win2K Questions  ("scott.marlowe" <scott.marlowe@ihs.com>)
Responses Re: Win2K Questions  (Bruce Momjian <pgman@candle.pha.pa.us>)
List pgsql-general
Tom Lane wrote:
>
> Jean-Luc Lachance <jllachan@nsd.ca> writes:
> > What would be involved in adding version and visibility to the index?
>
> * Index bloat.  An index entry is currently 8 bytes plus the index key,
> eg 12 bytes for an int4 index.  Version info would add 12 bytes.
> Doubling the size of indexes would double the time for index scans.

That is true for for small keys, but for varchar(20) the impact is less.

>
> * Update costs.  Instead of one place to update when a row is updated,
> now all the associated index entries would have to be updated too.

The index has to be updated anyhow to reflect the new record. Doesn't
it?

>
>                         regards, tom lane

pgsql-general by date:

Previous
From: Vassil Kriakov
Date:
Subject: Re: C++: get value for integral types?
Next
From: Tom Lane
Date:
Subject: Re: question about efficiency