Re: pg_stat_reset() weirdness - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Joe Conway
Subject Re: pg_stat_reset() weirdness
Date
Msg-id 3D53DF10.8010304@joeconway.com
Whole thread Raw
In response to pg_stat_reset() weirdness  ("Christopher Kings-Lynne" <chriskl@familyhealth.com.au>)
List pgsql-hackers
Christopher Kings-Lynne wrote:
> Hi guys,
> 
> If you apply the pg_stat_reset() function patch you get this regression
> failure.  Is this because it's returning a bool I guess?  Shall I just fix
> the regression test to exclude this function?

>         AND p1.proname != 'update_pg_pwd_and_pg_group';>    oid  |    proname> ! ------+---------------> !  2249 |
pg_stat_reset>! (1 row)
 

Likely because this is now in CVS:

DATA(insert OID = 2249 ( record        PGNSP PGUID  4 t p t \054 0 0 
oidin oidout          i p f 0 -1 0 _null_ _null_ ));
#define RECORDOID               2249

The Oids conflict.

Joe



pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Tom Lane
Date:
Subject: Re: [PATCHES] CREATE TEMP TABLE .... ON COMMIT
Next
From: Teodor Sigaev
Date:
Subject: Please, apply another patch to contrib/ltree