Re: Third call for platform testing - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Thomas Lockhart
Subject Re: Third call for platform testing
Date
Msg-id 3C14E33C.5E694885@fourpalms.org
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: Third call for platform testing  (Peter Eisentraut <peter_e@gmx.net>)
Responses Re: Third call for platform testing  (Bruce Momjian <pgman@candle.pha.pa.us>)
List pgsql-hackers
...
> Please note that QNX 4 and QNX 6 are completely different operating
> systems that happen to come from the same company.  So you don't want to
> have one entry for both of them.

Oh, of course. Don't know why one would assume that they are versions of
the *same* OS ;)

From recent emails, it looks like QNX 4 should be listed as supported,
and QNX 6 could/should be listed as "supported with patches". Or should
the status for 6 be something different?
                    - Thomas


pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Stephan Szabo
Date:
Subject: Re: pg_dump: Sorted output, referential integrity
Next
From: Manuel Sugawara
Date:
Subject: Re: date formatting and tab-complete patch