Re: Support for QNX6, POSIX IPC and PTHREAD-style locking - Mailing list pgsql-patches

From Igor Kovalenko
Subject Re: Support for QNX6, POSIX IPC and PTHREAD-style locking
Date
Msg-id 3C05332A.91B81DD5@motorola.com
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: Support for QNX6, POSIX IPC and PTHREAD-style locking  ("Christopher Kings-Lynne" <chriskl@familyhealth.com.au>)
List pgsql-patches
Tom Lane wrote:
>
> The fault for the miscommunication is probably mine, in that I didn't
> make it clear to you in the beginning that time was of the essence.
> I would like to apologize for that and move on.

Thanks. Actually you were one most helpful with the port. I also
actually understood quite well that time was important. It was
moderation what killed the time. Distribution of first patch was delayed
by almost a week and second version was still delayed by few days... I
don't want to blame anyone for those delays, but wondering why the heck
you need manual approvals here. You require people to subscribe, so
what's the point?

regards,
- igor

pgsql-patches by date:

Previous
From: Tom Lane
Date:
Subject: Re: Support for QNX6, POSIX IPC and PTHREAD-style locking
Next
From: Bruce Momjian
Date:
Subject: Re: Support for QNX6, POSIX IPC and PTHREAD-style locking