Re: J2SE 1.4 and other patches - Mailing list pgsql-jdbc
From | Barry Lind |
---|---|
Subject | Re: J2SE 1.4 and other patches |
Date | |
Msg-id | 3BCE3BD3.8070606@xythos.com Whole thread Raw |
In response to | Re: J2SE 1.4 and other patches ("Dave Cramer" <Dave@micro-automation.net>) |
List | pgsql-jdbc |
Joseph, To apply a patch you need to execute cvs commands. But to submit a patch you only need to send the diffs and new files to this list or the pgsql-patches email list. thanks, --Barry Joseph Shraibman wrote: > Don't you need execute cvs commands to add new files? I guess I don't > know. > > Barry Lind wrote: > >> Anyone can do that by submitting a patch. I don't see anything >> special that needs to be done. >> >> --Barry >> >> Joseph Shraibman wrote: >> >>> Right. And a maintainer needs to make a jdbc3 direcotry and modifiy >>> the ant files to use it when it detects a jdk of 1.4+ >>> >>> >>> Dave Cramer wrote: >>> >>>> What do you see wrong with the build process? >>>> >>>> Ant is used to build the driver! >>>> >>>> Dave >>>> >>>> -----Original Message----- >>>> From: pgsql-jdbc-owner@postgresql.org >>>> [mailto:pgsql-jdbc-owner@postgresql.org] On Behalf Of Joseph Shraibman >>>> Sent: October 16, 2001 5:45 PM >>>> To: Rene Pijlman >>>> Cc: Mark Lillywhite (pg-jdbc); pgsql-jdbc@postgresql.org >>>> Subject: Re: [JDBC] J2SE 1.4 and other patches >>>> >>>> >>>> I think what most needs to be done is for someone to update the build >>>> process, so people who want to hack code will have somewhere to >>>> start from. >>>> >>>> Rene Pijlman wrote: >>>> >>>> >>>>> On 13 Oct 2001 11:16:07 +1000, you wrote: >>>>> >>>>> >>>>>> I was just wondering if anyone is working on support for JDK1.4 >>>>>> for the postgresql drivers. >>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>> Not AFAIK. >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> >>>>>> It appears that there are some new methods defined >>>>>> in a few interfaces that need to be implemented (presumably to >>>>>> just throw the "unimplemented" exception?). >>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>> Do you mean JDBC 3.0 methods? What methods precisely? Are they >>>>> implementable? >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> >>>>>> Also, I have a patch for DatabaseMetaData to fix a bug in the >>>>>> metadata >>>>>> >>>> >>>>>> returned for BigDecimals. I have already tried to submit this >>>>>> patch 2 or 3 times (to peter@retep) but never heard back. It's >>>>>> only about 4 LOC but it makes introspecting the database much better. >>>>>> >>>>>> Is this the place to post a patch, and if I do, am I likely to get >>>>>> a response? >>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>> You can send patches to the pgsql-patches@postgresql.org list, >>>>> preferably with a CC to this list. Yes, you will get a response. >>>>> Usually, a patch is applied within a week (if the patch is good, of >>>>> course). >>>>> >>>>> If a patch to the JDBC driver needs discussion first, that should >>>>> be on this list. >>>>> >>>>> Regards, >>>>> René Pijlman <rene@lab.applinet.nl> >>>>> >>>>> ---------------------------(end of >>>>> broadcast)--------------------------- >>>>> TIP 4: Don't 'kill -9' the postmaster >>>>> >>>>> >>>> >>>> >>> >>> >> > >
pgsql-jdbc by date: