Tom Lane wrote:
>
> Hiroshi Inoue <Inoue@tpf.co.jp> writes:
> >> I'd say you shouldn't release it at all.
>
> > As far as I see I'm not releasing it.
>
> Oh, I hadn't looked closely at reindex_index. Hmm... okay, you are
> holding the lock acquired there.
Yes reindex_index is guarding itself.
> But you're still acquiring it way too
> late for my taste. All of the setup work in reindex_relation seems to
> be done without any lock.
OK I would add a heap_open() to reindex_relation.
Please wait a while. I've not reorganized my local
source yet.
regards,
Hiroshi Inoue
