Re: Re: JDBC 2.0 conformance, documentation and todo list - Mailing list pgsql-jdbc

From Barry Lind
Subject Re: Re: JDBC 2.0 conformance, documentation and todo list
Date
Msg-id 3B72CA47.7020106@xythos.com
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: Re: JDBC 2.0 conformance, documentation and todo list  (Peter Eisentraut <peter_e@gmx.net>)
Responses Re: Re: JDBC 2.0 conformance, documentation and todo list  (Peter Eisentraut <peter_e@gmx.net>)
List pgsql-jdbc
I would also be willing to bet that most other databases don't support
entry level sql to the letter either (look at how Oracle treats the
empty string (i.e. '') as null).  But I bet Oracle claims they support
entry level SQL in their JDBC driver since it is a requirement for J2EE.
  I don't see any problem with claiming support for entry level even
though there are a few exceptions.

thanks,
--Barry

Peter Eisentraut wrote:
> Barry Lind writes:
>
>
>>supportsANSI92EntryLevelSQL - Since postgres now does support outer
>>joins, I think the answer here should be yes.  I think the general
>>feeling is that if there is a deviation from entry level SQL92 it is a bug.
>>
>
> Outer joins are not required for entry level SQL.  Nevertheless,
> PostgreSQL does not and probably will never comply with entry level SQL to
> the letter, so the answer "false" is correct.
>
>



pgsql-jdbc by date:

Previous
From: Barry Lind
Date:
Subject: Re: Retrieving field of type bigint[]
Next
From: Joseph Shraibman
Date:
Subject: Re: JDBC Performance