shared temp tables - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From mlw
Subject shared temp tables
Date
Msg-id 3B308D53.9303D3A8@mohawksoft.com
Whole thread Raw
Responses Re: shared temp tables  (Bruce Momjian <pgman@candle.pha.pa.us>)
List pgsql-hackers
I love the fact that temp tables do not exist in every PostgreSQL session,
don't get me wrong. 

The issue is this: most "web environments" have the idea of a session. A
session management scheme based on PostgreSQL exposes PostgreSQL's worst
behavior. Small amount of records, high update/delete rate for each record. So
much so, that it probably isn't realistic to replace something like Oracle with
PostgreSQL in this environment.

Do "temp tables" suffer the same delete/update behavior of marking the row as
deleted and adding another row? Thus requiring vacuum periodically. 

If not, should/could there be a way to create a temp table that is globally
visible?


pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Alex Pilosov
Date:
Subject: statically linked PL's
Next
From: Michael Meskes
Date:
Subject: Re: