Karel Zak wrote:
> On Wed, 8 Nov 2000, Christof Petig wrote:
>
> > Karel Zak wrote:
> >
> > > > What about parameters? Normally you can prepare a statement and execute it
> > >
> > > We have in PG parameters, see SPI, but now it's used inside backend only
> > > and not exist statement that allows to use this feature in be<->fe.
> >
> > Sad. Since ecpg would certainly benefit from this.
Postponed for future improvements ...
> > > PREPARE chris_query AS SELECT * FROM pg_class WHERE relname = $1 USING text;
> >
> > I would prefer '?' as a parameter name, since this is in the embedded sql standard
> > (do you have a copy of the 94 draft? I can mail mine to you?)
>
> This not depend on query cache. The '$n' is PostgreSQL query parametr
> keyword and is defined in standard parser. The PREPARE statement not parsing
> query it's job for standard parser.
I see.
> > Also the standard says a whole lot about guessing the parameter's type.
> >
> > Also I vote for ?::type or type(?) or sql's cast(...) (don't know it's syntax)
> > instead of abusing the using keyword.
>
> The postgresql executor expect types of parametrs in separate input (array).
> I not sure how much expensive/executable is survey it from query.
That would involve changing the parser. Future project.
> > > EXECUTE chris_query USING 'pg_shadow';
> >
> > Great idea of yours to implement this! Since I was thinking about implementing a
> > more decent schema for ecpg but had no mind to touch the backend and be-fe
> > protocol (yet).
> > It would be desirable to do an 'execute immediate using', since using input
> > parameters would take a lot of code away from ecpg.
>
> By the way, PREPARE/EXECUTE is face only. More interesting in this period is
> query-cache-kernel. SQL92 is really a little unlike my PREPARE/EXECUTE.
I'm looking forward to get first experiences with the query cache kernel. I think it's
the right way to go.
Christof
