Re: postgresql newsgroups - Mailing list pgsql-general

From mr_hopkins@earthlink.net (Micheal H.)
Subject Re: postgresql newsgroups
Date
Msg-id 38ab9c23.4017753@news.earthlink.net
Whole thread Raw
In response to postgresql newsgroups  (jamesbinary@icqmail.com (James))
List pgsql-general
I agree completely.  Also these group send back an email to posts that
they don't reconize as coming from someone who as subscribed to the
group which I have.  There really doesn't seem to be enough posting to
warrent all of those different groups.

by the way, can i access my postgresql database using perl running on
WinNT, how?    thanks!

On 17 Feb 2000 05:50:29 +1050, jamesbinary@icqmail.com (James) wrote:

>My ISP's newserver carries the following postresql groups:
>
>comp.databases.postgresql
>comp.databases.postgresql.bugs
>comp.databases.postgresql.docs
>comp.databases.postgresql.hackers
>comp.databases.postgresql.patches
>comp.databases.postgresql.questions
>
>The trouble is that there are hardly any articles coming into these groups.
>
>Is the bulk of user generated information about postgresql in mailing
>lists?  (I'm subscribe to too many already)
>
>I can't understand why there are so few messages about a free database
>package.
>
>And if this isn't too inflamatory a question, where does postgresql stand
>in comparison to MySql and DB2? (both of which aren't free I believe).


pgsql-general by date:

Previous
From: Louis Bertrand
Date:
Subject: Re: [GENERAL] ownership of DBs and tables?
Next
From: Nemeth Miklos
Date:
Subject: RE: postgresql newsgroups