John Henderson wrote:
>
> This is what I want to do:
> select user_name, date_trunc('minutes',sum(is_roundup_01(sess_time)))
> from sessions_feb2000_homer s where
> date_part('epoch',start)>'949316399' and
> date_part('epoch',start)<'951822000' and
> prob here> user_name IN (select username from userdir
> where towncode = 'LAB')
> group by user_name
> order by user_name;
>
> The problem is that user_name = 'soandso' will use an index scan
> but user_name IN (select ...) uses a sequential scan.
>
> Any advice on how to force this to use an index?
> Yes the index exists, yes it has been vaccuumed. This is PG 6.5.3
IIRC, this is a known issue with 'IN', and that the traditional
solution was to replace use of 'IN' with 'EXISTS', i.e.,
and EXISTS (select * from userdir where user_name = username and
towncode...)
Cheers,
Ed Loehr
