Re: Missing SELECT output on btree_gin char, BTLess* strategy - Mailing list pgsql-bugs

From Tom Lane
Subject Re: Missing SELECT output on btree_gin char, BTLess* strategy
Date
Msg-id 3821851.1628615647@sss.pgh.pa.us
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: Missing SELECT output on btree_gin char, BTLess* strategy  (Peter Geoghegan <pg@bowt.ie>)
List pgsql-bugs
Peter Geoghegan <pg@bowt.ie> writes:
> On Mon, Aug 9, 2021 at 6:15 PM Jason Kim <git@jasonk.me> wrote:
>> The expected output in contrib/btree_gin/expected/char.out is wrong for the
>> first two SELECTs using the BTLess* strategies: they should not be empty.

> Isn't this index corruption, or at least an inconsistent opclass?

Indeed.  After a bit of poking around, I realized that btree_gin's
leftmostvalue_char() is not on the same page as btcharcmp() about
whether type "char" is signed or unsigned.

AFAICT, only the latter function matters while making index entries,
while the wrong value from leftmostvalue_char() affects only search
results.  So we can just fix it, as attached.

            regards, tom lane

diff --git a/contrib/btree_gin/btree_gin.c b/contrib/btree_gin/btree_gin.c
index e05b5c60ca..c50d68ce18 100644
--- a/contrib/btree_gin/btree_gin.c
+++ b/contrib/btree_gin/btree_gin.c
@@ -357,7 +357,7 @@ GIN_SUPPORT(bpchar, true, leftmostvalue_text, bpcharcmp)
 static Datum
 leftmostvalue_char(void)
 {
-    return CharGetDatum(SCHAR_MIN);
+    return CharGetDatum(0);
 }

 GIN_SUPPORT(char, false, leftmostvalue_char, btcharcmp)
diff --git a/contrib/btree_gin/expected/char.out b/contrib/btree_gin/expected/char.out
index 09e0315de0..6563546d3c 100644
--- a/contrib/btree_gin/expected/char.out
+++ b/contrib/btree_gin/expected/char.out
@@ -7,12 +7,19 @@ CREATE INDEX idx_char ON test_char USING gin (i);
 SELECT * FROM test_char WHERE i<'d'::"char" ORDER BY i;
  i
 ---
-(0 rows)
+ a
+ b
+ c
+(3 rows)

 SELECT * FROM test_char WHERE i<='d'::"char" ORDER BY i;
  i
 ---
-(0 rows)
+ a
+ b
+ c
+ d
+(4 rows)

 SELECT * FROM test_char WHERE i='d'::"char" ORDER BY i;
  i

pgsql-bugs by date:

Previous
From: Tom Lane
Date:
Subject: Re: Postgres 9.2.13 on AIX 7.1
Next
From: Kacey Holston
Date:
Subject: Re: Issue with logical replication