Re: pg_upgrade improvements - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Tom Lane
Subject Re: pg_upgrade improvements
Date
Msg-id 3804.1333640050@sss.pgh.pa.us
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: pg_upgrade improvements  (Stephen Frost <sfrost@snowman.net>)
Responses Re: pg_upgrade improvements  (Magnus Hagander <magnus@hagander.net>)
List pgsql-hackers
Stephen Frost <sfrost@snowman.net> writes:
> * Andres Freund (andres@anarazel.de) wrote:
>> Why would pipes be more useful? Its not like you could build useful pipelines 
>> with them.

> The point is to avoid the risk that someone else could connect to the
> database at the same time you're doing work on it.

Right.  Unless I misunderstand the semantics of named pipes on Windows,
we don't want that because in principle some unrelated process could
connect to it as soon as you set it up.
        regards, tom lane


pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Andres Freund
Date:
Subject: Re: pg_upgrade improvements
Next
From: Tom Lane
Date:
Subject: Re: pg_upgrade improvements