-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1
On Sat, Apr 26, 2008 at 4:27 AM, Alvaro Herrera wrote:
> Andrew Dunstan wrote:
> >
> > Bruce Momjian wrote:
> >> Log Message:
> >> -----------
> >> Update:
> >>
> >> >>
> >>> * Allow adding/removing enumerated values to an existing enumerated data
> >
> > Where did this come from? Adding values anywhere except on the end of
> > the enumeration list will be fraught with danger, as will removing them.
> > In essence, either operation would entail rewriting every table that
> > used the type. Anything else carries a major risk of corruption. That
> > seems like a pretty bad idea.
>
> We already support rewriting tables ... (albeit only one at a time, I
> admit. Doing it for more than one can cause deadlocks).
>
> Still, if the user wants to pay the cost, why should we prohibit it?
>
I agree with Alvaro's sentiment here, but it does seem likely that
adding an value to the end of an enum list is much lower-hanging fruit
than add/remove.
Has anyone had a close look at how hard it would be allow just the
"add to the end" capability?
Cheers,
BJ
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.7 (GNU/Linux)
Comment: http://getfiregpg.org
iD8DBQFIEiWO5YBsbHkuyV0RAo5pAKDMQ7aAbJJyIe74c+PacXVXg5chXACdEnv3
sFiNsSf193/C9HpW5UVhYWs=
=jOzI
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
