Re: Should we still have old release notes in docs? - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Tom Lane
Subject Re: Should we still have old release notes in docs?
Date
Msg-id 3732.1549987940@sss.pgh.pa.us
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: Should we still have old release notes in docs?  (Andres Freund <andres@anarazel.de>)
Responses Re: Should we still have old release notes in docs?  ("Jonathan S. Katz" <jkatz@postgresql.org>)
Re: Should we still have old release notes in docs?  (Thomas Kellerer <shammat@gmx.net>)
List pgsql-hackers
Andres Freund <andres@anarazel.de> writes:
> On 2019-02-12 11:00:51 -0500, Greg Stark wrote:
>> I love having the old release notes online but perhaps they can be
>> somewhere other than the main docs? We could limit the current docs to
>> including the release notes for just the supported versions -- after
>> all you can always get the old release notes in the old docs
>> themselves.

> You're behind the times, that just happened (in a pretty uncoordinated
> manner).

Yeah, see 527b5ed1a et al.

The part about having a unified release-note archive somewhere else is
still WIP.  The ball is in the web team's court on that, I think.

            regards, tom lane


pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Arseny Sher
Date:
Subject: Re: Too rigorous assert in reorderbuffer.c
Next
From: John Naylor
Date:
Subject: Re: use Getopt::Long for catalog scripts