Re: Should we still have old release notes in docs? - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Andres Freund
Subject Re: Should we still have old release notes in docs?
Date
Msg-id 20190212160432.r7zmnhhoezvl3zy7@alap3.anarazel.de
Whole thread Raw
In response to Should we still have old release notes in docs?  (Greg Stark <stark@mit.edu>)
Responses Re: Should we still have old release notes in docs?  (Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>)
List pgsql-hackers
Hi,

On 2019-02-12 11:00:51 -0500, Greg Stark wrote:
> I was just perusing our PDF docs for the first time in ages and
> realized that of the 3,400+ pages of docs there's about 1,000 pages of
> release notes in it.... That seems like a bit overkill.
> 
> I love having the old release notes online but perhaps they can be
> somewhere other than the main docs? We could limit the current docs to
> including the release notes for just the supported versions -- after
> all you can always get the old release notes in the old docs
> themselves.

You're behind the times, that just happened (in a pretty uncoordinated
manner).

Greetings,

Andres Freund


pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Greg Stark
Date:
Subject: Should we still have old release notes in docs?
Next
From: Arseny Sher
Date:
Subject: Re: Too rigorous assert in reorderbuffer.c