If this is the consensus, then I'm fine with posting to -patches... I just want to make sure people are aware of it so it can get tested. Thanks.
On 3/2/06, Alvaro Herrera <alvherre@commandprompt.com> wrote: Jonah H. Harris wrote:
> All,
>
> This is only the current patch updated to apply cleanly on cvs... it's not
> ready for -patches yet as I still haven't spent much time looking through it
> and testing it. This is just for anyone to play with and find issues.
Somebody else already did this in the last few days -- post a patch to
-hackers instead of -patches, claiming that since it's not ready, it's
not suitable for the latter. I think this is a mistake; a patch is a
patch, whether it's ready for application or not, so it should be posted
to pgsql-patches. You can of course indicate that the patch is a
work-in-progress and that it shouldn't be applied yet.
Anyway thanks for the patch,
--
Alvaro Herrera http://www.CommandPrompt.com/
The PostgreSQL Company - Command Prompt, Inc.
--
Jonah H. Harris, Database Internals Architect
EnterpriseDB Corporation
732.331.1324
