Re: INS/UPD/DEL Returning P.tch - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Neil Conway
Subject Re: INS/UPD/DEL Returning P.tch
Date
Msg-id 1141338814.24513.3.camel@localhost.localdomain
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: INS/UPD/DEL Returning P.tch  ("Jonah H. Harris" <jonah.harris@gmail.com>)
List pgsql-hackers
On Thu, 2006-03-02 at 17:23 -0500, Jonah H. Harris wrote:
> If this is the consensus, then I'm fine with posting to -patches

Yeah, -patches is the right place.

> I just want to make sure people are aware of it so it can get tested.

I wouldn't expect a whole lot of testing. The usual process is that the
person submitting the patch does all the coding and testing, then
submits it to -patches. When the patch is reviewed, you might need to
resubmit it a few times to satisfy the reviewers' comments. Then a
committer will apply the patch (often with some additional changes, at
least in my case).

-Neil




pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: "Jonah H. Harris"
Date:
Subject: Re: INS/UPD/DEL Returning P.tch
Next
From: "Craig A. James"
Date:
Subject: Re: PG Extensions: Must be statically linked?