Re: Contributor List policy - Mailing list pgsql-advocacy

From Marc G. Fournier
Subject Re: Contributor List policy
Date
Msg-id 3543924B67ABC3DB8DB1B41D@ganymede.hub.org
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: Contributor List policy  ("Joshua D. Drake" <jd@commandprompt.com>)
Responses Re: Contributor List policy  (Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>)
Re: Contributor List policy  (Bruce Momjian <bruce@momjian.us>)
List pgsql-advocacy
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1



- --On Monday, March 10, 2008 17:40:46 -0700 "Joshua D. Drake"
<jd@commandprompt.com> wrote:

> I do not care if I am personally listed.

Actually, I don't disagree that you should be listed, I disagree with merging
Contributor and Developer into one ... there should be two lists, of which you
would definitely be label'd a 'Major Contributor' ...

> My concern which has been stated on multiple points on this thread is
> that people who are major contributors are recognized as such,
> regardless of their code contributions.

Agreed, but distinguishing between 'contributor' and 'developer' doesn't
diminish that ...

> I suggest a multi-tiered list that is representative for each group
> including developers.

Sorry, must have missed that part of the thread ... could you do a quick mock
up of what you are thinking on the above?

- ----
Marc G. Fournier           Hub.Org Networking Services (http://www.hub.org)
Email . scrappy@hub.org                              MSN . scrappy@hub.org
Yahoo . yscrappy               Skype: hub.org        ICQ . 7615664
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v2.0.4 (FreeBSD)

iD8DBQFH1eSa4QvfyHIvDvMRAmTBAKDCJ9Pjdrz6+PbIgB73mE8hJKPKsACgzaVG
b3hZYvqhTaoyYY8abOe8ppU=
=FBPA
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----


pgsql-advocacy by date:

Previous
From: "Joshua D. Drake"
Date:
Subject: Re: Contributor List policy
Next
From: Tom Lane
Date:
Subject: Re: Contributor List policy