Re: Is RAID10 the best choice? - Mailing list pgsql-performance

From Alex Turner
Subject Re: Is RAID10 the best choice?
Date
Msg-id 33c6269f0512112045u2dfe2393y59df6a89a7a5437a@mail.gmail.com
Whole thread Raw
In response to Is RAID10 the best choice?  (Carlos Benkendorf <carlosbenkendorf@yahoo.com.br>)
List pgsql-performance
Personaly I would split into two RAID 1s.  One for pg_xlog, one for
the rest.  This gives probably the best performance/reliability
combination.

Alex.

On 12/10/05, Carlos Benkendorf <carlosbenkendorf@yahoo.com.br> wrote:
> Hello,
>
> I would like to know which is the best configuration to use 4 scsi drives
> with a pg 8.1 server.
>
> Configuring them as a RAID10 set seems a good choice but now I´m figuring
> another configuration:
> SCSI drive 1: operational system
> SCSI drive 2: pg_xlog
> SCSI drive 3: data
> SCSI drive 4: index
>
> I know the difference between them when you analyze risks of loosing data
> but how about performance?
>
> What should be better?
>
> Obs.: Our system uses always an index for every access..
> (enable_seqscan(false))
>
> Thanks in advance!
>
> Benkendorf
>
>  ________________________________
>  Yahoo! doce lar. Faça do Yahoo! sua homepage.
>
>

pgsql-performance by date:

Previous
From: Mike C
Date:
Subject: Re: Table Partitions / Partial Indexes
Next
From: "Andy Ballingall"
Date:
Subject: 2 phase commit: performance implications?