Re: Table Partitions / Partial Indexes - Mailing list pgsql-performance

From Mike C
Subject Re: Table Partitions / Partial Indexes
Date
Msg-id bd0eabd0512111849q4b967bf0scb14d1b47993a370@mail.gmail.com
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: Table Partitions / Partial Indexes  (Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>)
List pgsql-performance
On 12/12/05, Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us> wrote:
Mike C <smith.not.western@gmail.com> writes:
> CLUSTER on PC_TRAFFIC_IDX3 gives me significantly improved performance:

How can you tell?  Neither of these are EXPLAIN ANALYZE output.

                        regards, tom lane


Sorry that's a result of my bad record keeping. I've been keeping records of the explain but not the analyze. IIRC the times dropped from ~25 seconds down to ~8 seconds (using analyze).

Regards,

Mike


pgsql-performance by date:

Previous
From: Tom Lane
Date:
Subject: Re: Table Partitions / Partial Indexes
Next
From: Alex Turner
Date:
Subject: Re: Is RAID10 the best choice?