"Euler Taveira" <euler@eulerto.com> writes:
> You didn't provide a test case as requested but I investigated this issue
> according to your description. The following commands is sufficient to produce
> the analysis below.
Thanks for looking into it! The ingredient I missed while studying this
earlier is that the table must have *both* table-level and column-level
ACLs to provoke the issue.
> It means that an ACL for columns has 2 dependencies (nDeps = 2) the function
> _tocEntryRequired() returns 0 (see code below).
D'oh. I think this code was correct when written, but we added an extra
dependency from column ACL to table ACL later because restoring them in
the wrong order causes problems.
> The discussion [1] in the commit 0d4e6ed3085 does not explain if the 'if' logic
> covers all cases. It certainly doesn't for the OP case. The only (hackish)
> suggestion I have ATM is to detect ACL for columns and returns 1.
Yeah, ignoring dependencies on ACLs in this logic seems like the best
way forward. Do you want to write a patch?
regards, tom lane