Re: NOT EXIST for PREPARE - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Tom Lane
Subject Re: NOT EXIST for PREPARE
Date
Msg-id 3272.1458835195@sss.pgh.pa.us
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: NOT EXIST for PREPARE  (Vladimir Sitnikov <sitnikov.vladimir@gmail.com>)
Responses Re: NOT EXIST for PREPARE
Re: NOT EXIST for PREPARE
List pgsql-hackers
Vladimir Sitnikov <sitnikov.vladimir@gmail.com> writes:
> Tom>If you think that's not a protocol change, you are mistaken.  It
> Tom>changes a behavior that's specified in the protocol documentation.

> Even if it requires documentation, this particular change will work seamlessly
> across existing implementations of v3 protocol.

No, because it would break applications that are not expecting prepared
statement names starting with '__' to work differently than they did
before.  Not to mention that the whole idea of that being a semantically
significant property of a name is a monstrous kluge.
        regards, tom lane



pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Christian Ullrich
Date:
Subject: Re: BUG #13854: SSPI authentication failure: wrong realm name used
Next
From: Tom Lane
Date:
Subject: Re: Show dropped users' backends in pg_stat_activity