Re: Outdated comments about proc->sem in lwlock.c - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Daniel Gustafsson
Subject Re: Outdated comments about proc->sem in lwlock.c
Date
Msg-id 3270B583-C8D8-4F7C-A461-827DF4CFE946@yesql.se
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: Outdated comments about proc->sem in lwlock.c  (Thomas Munro <thomas.munro@gmail.com>)
Responses Re: Outdated comments about proc->sem in lwlock.c  (Thomas Munro <thomas.munro@gmail.com>)
List pgsql-hackers
> On 3 Jun 2021, at 04:07, Thomas Munro <thomas.munro@gmail.com> wrote:

> Here's a patch to remove the misleading comments.

While not an expert in the area; reading the referenced commit and the code
with the now removed comments, I think this is correct.

--
Daniel Gustafsson        https://vmware.com/




pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Peter Geoghegan
Date:
Subject: Re: [PoC] Improve dead tuple storage for lazy vacuum
Next
From: Daniel Gustafsson
Date:
Subject: Re: Replace remaining castNode(…, lfirst(…)) and friends calls with l*_node()