Re: Outdated comments about proc->sem in lwlock.c - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Thomas Munro
Subject Re: Outdated comments about proc->sem in lwlock.c
Date
Msg-id CA+hUKGKbqpBvfzzX8bZG_sORyCCDN8dHeUiVN+pPdWzHv5zEDQ@mail.gmail.com
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: Outdated comments about proc->sem in lwlock.c  (Daniel Gustafsson <daniel@yesql.se>)
List pgsql-hackers
On Thu, Jul 8, 2021 at 8:48 AM Daniel Gustafsson <daniel@yesql.se> wrote:
> > On 3 Jun 2021, at 04:07, Thomas Munro <thomas.munro@gmail.com> wrote:
> > Here's a patch to remove the misleading comments.
>
> While not an expert in the area; reading the referenced commit and the code
> with the now removed comments, I think this is correct.

Thanks!  I made the comments slightly more uniform and pushed.



pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Amul Sul
Date:
Subject: Re: when the startup process doesn't (logging startup delays)
Next
From: Fujii Masao
Date:
Subject: Re: Transactions involving multiple postgres foreign servers, take 2