Bruce Momjian <pgman@candle.pha.pa.us> writes:
> Tom Lane wrote:
>> It seems like clutter to me. Whether a catalog is shared or not is not
>> necessarily the first thing you want to know about it.
> I am thinking the table should be split into two, one for the global
> tables, and another for the db-local tables.
That's even worse, as it converts the distinction into something you
must know even to look up the table.
> I don't think we make it clear enough which tables are global.
I think the labels appearing in the per-catalog descriptions are plenty
clear.
regards, tom lane
