Tom Lane wrote:
> Jaime Casanova <systemguards@gmail.com> writes:
> > On 1/3/06, pres <pgn.lists@gmail.com> wrote:
> >> i would find it helpful if Table 42-1 included a column that identified
> >> whehter each catalog is shared or not. convenient, but given that the
> >> documentation does contain it, not necessary.
>
> > is this acceptable or usefull? if so, i can do it after work...
>
> It seems like clutter to me. Whether a catalog is shared or not is not
> necessarily the first thing you want to know about it.
I am thinking the table should be split into two, one for the global
tables, and another for the db-local tables. I don't think we make it
clear enough which tables are global.
--
Bruce Momjian | http://candle.pha.pa.us
pgman@candle.pha.pa.us | (610) 359-1001
+ If your life is a hard drive, | 13 Roberts Road
+ Christ can be your backup. | Newtown Square, Pennsylvania 19073
