Re: Delegating superuser tasks to new security roles (Was: Granting control of SUSET gucs to non-superusers) - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Tom Lane
Subject Re: Delegating superuser tasks to new security roles (Was: Granting control of SUSET gucs to non-superusers)
Date
Msg-id 304963.1627400214@sss.pgh.pa.us
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: Delegating superuser tasks to new security roles (Was: Granting control of SUSET gucs to non-superusers)  (Robert Haas <robertmhaas@gmail.com>)
List pgsql-hackers
Robert Haas <robertmhaas@gmail.com> writes:
> Dang it, yes. The tenant needs to be members of all the other users,
> not the other way around. I spent a long time trying to not get that
> backwards and still did.

The "membership" terminology is inherently confusing I fear.
Maybe better to say that all the roles-to-be-audited must
be GRANTed to the "tenant" role?

            regards, tom lane



pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Andrew Dunstan
Date:
Subject: Re: Reduce the number of special cases to build contrib modules on windows
Next
From: ilmari@ilmari.org (Dagfinn Ilmari Mannsåker)
Date:
Subject: Re: Reduce the number of special cases to build contrib modules on windows