Re: Unhappy thoughts about pg_dump and objects inherited from template1 - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Philip Warner
Subject Re: Unhappy thoughts about pg_dump and objects inherited from template1
Date
Msg-id 3.0.5.32.20001109032405.02be5100@mail.rhyme.com.au
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: Unhappy thoughts about pg_dump and objects inherited from template1  (Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>)
Responses Re: Unhappy thoughts about pg_dump and objects inherited from template1
List pgsql-hackers
At 11:13 8/11/00 -0500, Tom Lane wrote:
>
>Do we still need the lastsysoid column in pg_database if we do things
>this way?  Seems like what you really want is to suppress all the
>objects that are in template0, so you really only need one lastsysoid
>value, namely template0's.  The other entries are useless AFAICS.

That sounds reasonable; although there may be some value in allowing dumps
relative to template0 OR template1. Not sure.

Where would you store the value if not in pg_database?


----------------------------------------------------------------
Philip Warner                    |     __---_____
Albatross Consulting Pty. Ltd.   |----/       -  \
(A.B.N. 75 008 659 498)          |          /(@)   ______---_
Tel: (+61) 0500 83 82 81         |                 _________  \
Fax: (+61) 0500 83 82 82         |                 ___________ |
Http://www.rhyme.com.au          |                /           \|                                |    --________--
PGP key available upon request,  |  /
and from pgp5.ai.mit.edu:11371   |/


pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Tom Lane
Date:
Subject: Re: Unhappy thoughts about pg_dump and objects inherited from template1
Next
From: Tom Lane
Date:
Subject: Re: Unhappy thoughts about pg_dump and objects inherited from template1