Re: Unhappy thoughts about pg_dump and objects inherited from template1 - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Tom Lane
Subject Re: Unhappy thoughts about pg_dump and objects inherited from template1
Date
Msg-id 27786.973701760@sss.pgh.pa.us
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: Unhappy thoughts about pg_dump and objects inherited from template1  (Philip Warner <pjw@rhyme.com.au>)
Responses Re: Unhappy thoughts about pg_dump and objects inherited from template1  (Jan Wieck <janwieck@Yahoo.com>)
List pgsql-hackers
Philip Warner <pjw@rhyme.com.au> writes:
> Where would you store the value if not in pg_database?

No other ideas at the moment.  I was just wondering whether there was any
way to delete it entirely, but seems like we want to have the value for
template0 available.  The old way of hardwiring knowledge into pg_dump
was definitely not as good.
        regards, tom lane


pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Philip Warner
Date:
Subject: Re: Unhappy thoughts about pg_dump and objects inherited from template1
Next
From: Peter Eisentraut
Date:
Subject: Re: Type resolution for operators