Re: WIP: System Versioned Temporal Table - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Vik Fearing
Subject Re: WIP: System Versioned Temporal Table
Date
Msg-id 2bd64392-b86c-9c08-f61e-cf04424a7341@postgresfriends.org
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: WIP: System Versioned Temporal Table  (Simon Riggs <simon.riggs@enterprisedb.com>)
List pgsql-hackers
On 1/14/21 10:22 PM, Simon Riggs wrote:
> On Thu, Jan 14, 2021 at 5:46 PM Surafel Temesgen <surafel3000@gmail.com> wrote:
> 
>> On Fri, Jan 8, 2021 at 7:50 PM Ryan Lambert <ryan@rustprooflabs.com> wrote:
>>>
>>> I prefer to have them hidden by default.  This was mentioned up-thread with no decision, it seems the standard is
ambiguous. MS SQL appears to have flip-flopped on this decision [1].
 
> 
> I think the default should be like this:
> 
> SELECT * FROM foo FOR SYSTEM_TIME AS OF ...
> should NOT include the Start and End timestamp columns
> because this acts like a normal query just with a different snapshot timestamp
> 
> SELECT * FROM foo FOR SYSTEM_TIME BETWEEN x AND y
> SHOULD include the Start and End timestamp columns
> since this form of query can include multiple row versions for the
> same row, so it makes sense to see the validity times


I don't read the standard as being ambiguous about this at all.  The
columns should be shown just like any other column of the table.

I am not opposed to being able to set an attribute on columns allowing
them to be excluded from "*" but that is irrelevant to this patch.
-- 
Vik Fearing



pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Vik Fearing
Date:
Subject: Re: LET clause
Next
From: Vik Fearing
Date:
Subject: Re: WIP: System Versioned Temporal Table